News
LEA anticipates rising demand for private jet flights
London Executive Aviation (LEA), UK’s top private jet charter operator, has experienced a rise in bookings and enquiries for the past days. The company is anticipating a rise in private jets as corporate and private customers to try to circumvent backlogs caused by the volcanic activity in Iceland.
“Despite the reopening of UK airspace, the travel situation remains extremely dynamic, as airlines struggle to reposition their fleets and deal with huge passenger backlogs,” explained LEA chief executive Patrick Margetson-Rushmore. “It will plainly be days or even weeks before life returns to normal, and yet travellers still need to get home and companies have to get on with business. In this situation, business jets come into their own, and we have seen a tremendous rise in bookings.”
He continued: “Our business jet fleet was able to respond immediately when airspace reopened, and we have many of our aircraft now en route between London and various points in Europe. Because we fly point-to-point, can land at thousands of airfields near our customers’ final destinations and have such quick turnaround times, we expect to be carrying hundreds of passengers in the coming week.”
“Nobody relishes the idea of flying from a major hub airport right now, where you can expect to see confusion, frustration, delays and chaos all around you,” continued Margetson-Rushmore. “Happily, business jets can operate from uncrowded general aviation facilities, so travellers stressed out from the uncertainty of recent days will immediately begin to relax as they board one of our aircraft.”
Margetson-Rushmore is critical of how the authorities reacted to the threats of the volcanic ash. He explained:
“Safety is our paramount concern, so we will not fly visual flight rules (VFR) low-level operations in the current environment created by the volcanic ash. Nonetheless, although safety should never be compromised, I do think we have seen a general over-reaction by the authorities to a situation that required deeper and more sensible thought – basically, was it really necessary to have such a blanket and wide exclusion zone of up to 2,000 miles? It seems there was not enough serious data assessment at an early enough stage as to the density of volcanic ash in a given place at a given time. After all, the authorities and engine manufacturers will surely have had data collated from previous volcanic events.”
Source: CharterX
